Thum v. Iserman
Thum v. Iserman
54 N.Y.S. 559; 25 Misc. 327
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The amended complaint, which was accepted by the defendant and was verified, required from the defendant an amended answer, winch should have been verified. The answer served was not verified. Therefore the judgment as entered was correct practice.
The defendant’s default, however, will be vacated, providing he will within six days comply with the terms imposed by the order appealed from; and if he refuses to do so, then the motion to vacate judgment is hereby denied, and the order appealed from affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.