City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

Dupignac v. Quick

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided March 15, 1899

26 Misc. 872

Counsel

Loftus & Caffrey (Patrick H. Loftus, of counsel), for appellant., Henry B. Culver, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think that the tender upon the trial of the bond offered and approved by the court was sufficient. Code, § 1917..

The plaintiff was not bound in his complaint to allege the loss of the note sued upon, nor was he bound to offer sooner than he did the bond mentioned.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.