City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach

West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided March 15, 1899
27 Misc. 815; 57 N.Y.S. 396

Counsel

A. S. Luria, for appellant., Deyo, Duer & Bauerdorf, for respondent., W. H. Blinker, for respondent.

West Side Bank v. Foehrenbach

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Orders affirmed, with costs. The order appointing Mr. Hyatt receiver, was made after due notice to the judgment debtor and other judgment creditors having proceedings pending. The only right which the Pennsylvania Class Company had after the appointment of such receiver was to have such receivership extended so as to protect its interests.

It was, therefore, proper for the Special Term justice to deny its motion to vacate such receivership.

Present: Eitzsimons, Ch. J.; Conlan and,Schttchman, JJ..

Orders affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.