City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

Carroll v. Toplitz

Carroll v. Toplitz
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1899 · McCarthy
27 Misc. 833; 60 N.Y.S. 1134

Counsel

H. L. Toplitz, for appellant,, Mulqueen & Mulquéen, for respondents.

Carroll v. Toplitz

Opinion of the Court

McCarthy, J.

This case was fairly and, we think:, properly-submitted to the jury.

Upon the question which the jury were to and did pass on, we find no ground for any claim that they have found through prejudice, sympathy or passion arid, therefore, unless there is clearly some error of law, we cannot and will not- disturb the-verdict of the juiy.

It is true that many objections have been taken during the trial, but we do not, after careful examination, find reasonable error.

Oloott, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.