City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

Ehrenreich v. Lichtenberg

Ehrenreich v. Lichtenberg
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 15, 1899 · Hascall
28 Misc. 789; 59 N.Y.S. 383

Counsel

Horwitz & Samuels (Otto Horwitz, of counsel), for appellants., Jacob Fromme, for respondents.

Ehrenreich v. Lichtenberg

Opinion of the Court

Hascall, J.

Appeal is taken from an order of the Special Term, awarding to the plaintiffs costs against executors.

We think that, without positive charge in the moving papers that the executors unreasonably neglected or resisted the claim, no costs should follow; for it does not necessarily result that, because a verdict was had by the plaintiffs, defendants unreasonably opposed their action.

Moreover it does not affirmatively appear from the moving papers that the defendants did not file the consent provided for by section 1822 of the Code.

*790To obtain the exemption provided by the statute, the hearing and determination of the claim is upon settlement of the executors’ account, not to refer the controversy; and there is yet time for the appellants to avail themselves of the statutory permission, §§ 1822, 1836, 2743.

Order appealed from reversed, with costs.

Sohuchmah, J., concurs.

Order reversed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.