City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

Steinhart v. Carver

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided July 15, 1899

28 Misc. 794; 59 N.Y.S. 1115

Counsel

Furlong & O’Connell (Henry J. Furlong, of counsel), for appellant., Frayer, Smith, White & Seaman (Eugene Prayer, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The practice of the appellant’s attorneys in entering judgment and issuing execution on the sixty-dollar claim, *795after the principal had been paid to and retained by them, does not commend itself to the court, and. this view of the case, doubtless, influenced the judge at Special Term in exercising his discretion as to the terms upon which the judgment should be vacated.

Order appealed from affirmed, with costs.

Present: Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.