City of New York Municipal Court, 1899

Silo v. Linde

Silo v. Linde
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 15, 1899 · Dwyer
30 Misc. 812; 61 N.Y.S. 1148

Counsel

Hoadly, Lauterbaeh & Johnson (Eugene Treadwell and Herbert R. Limburger, of counsel), for appellant., Oppenheim & Severance, for respondent.

Silo v. Linde

Opinion of the Court

O’Dwyer, J.

On the hearing of the motion for a resettlement of the order as entered, and after having his attention directly called to the alleged errors in the order as entered, tfie justice determined that the order as entered correctly stated that the papers used upon the motion and the decision of the court thereon, and with that disposition by the justice presiding, we are not disposed to interfere.

Order appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.'

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.