Holme v. Crimmins
Holme v. Crimmins
31 Misc. 813; 63 N.Y.S. 1110
Opinion of the Court
We think the appellant entitled to the full relief sought. It seems, from the papers before us, that the items refused below were quite proper and necessary and should follow those ordered by the Special Term.
So much of the order appealed from as denies further particulars is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements and defendant’s demand in the notice already served is granted.
McCarthy, J., concurs.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.