City of New York Municipal Court, 1900

King v. Gossel

King v. Gossel
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1900 · Conlan
32 Misc. 770

Counsel

Carter, Hughes & Dwight (George W. Schurman, of counsel), for appellant., Daniel W. Patterson, for respondent.

King v. Gossel

Opinion of the Court

Conlan, J.

We are satisfied, on examination, that the defendant should be allowed to serve his proposed amended answer. The order appealed from will be modified so as to allow defendant to serve his' answer within five days from the entry of an order on this decision on the payment of taxable costs to date, together with ten dollars costs of this motion, at the same time stipulating that the cause retain its place on the calendar and be tried when reached. Otherwise, order appealed from affirmed and costs of this appeal, in either event, to respondent.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Hascall, J., concur.

Order modified, and as modified, affirmed; with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.