City of New York Municipal Court, 1900

Schurck v. Nutter

Schurck v. Nutter
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1900 · Hascall
32 Misc. 774; 66 N.Y.S. 1144

Counsel

Gifford, Stearns & Hobbs (William S. Haskell, of counsel), for appellant., Thompson & Maloney (J. Campbell Thompson, of counsel), for respondent.

Schurck v. Nutter

Opinion of the Court

Hascall, J.

It seems to us, from the testimony adduced upon the trial, that respondent sustained the allegations of his complaint, by the necessary weight of evidence, which enabled the jury to say that the appellant promised or agreed to pay the commission sued for, of was cognizant of effort being made in her behalf for which, if successful, she would be obliged to pay the customary rate. We also find that the question was fairly submitted below.

Judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.