City of New York Municipal Court, 1900

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1900 · Hascall
32 Misc. 774; 66 N.Y.S. 472

Counsel

Beardsley & Hemmens (Samuel A. Beardsley and Henry J. Hemmens, of counsel), for appellants., Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James (A. J. Dittenhoefer and David Gerber, of counsel), for respondent.

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

Opinion of the Court

Hascall, J.

This appeal only brings up for review a question of law. Both sides, at the trial, moved for direction of a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. No motion for dismissal of complaint was made by defendants when plaintiff rested, as might properly have been done, so their point that plaintiff had not proven ownership *775is not well taken, the right to so object having been waived by their silence. We think that, under the authorities cited (96 U. S. 51, 7 Wall. 82 and 31 Misc. Rep. 87), the ruling of the trial justice was correct.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.