Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
City of New York Municipal Court, 1900

Zeeman v. Rosenthal

Zeeman v. Rosenthal
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1900
32 Misc. 777; 66 N.Y.S. 1151

Counsel

Louis Levy, for appellant., Max D. Steuer (Abraham S. Levy, of counsel), for respondents.

Zeeman v. Rosenthal

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The promise of defendant was not a promise to answer for the debt or default of another. It was an original promise. It was not necessary that it should have been in writing.

We think that no error was committed, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.