City of New York Municipal Court, 1900

Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co.

Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided October 15, 1900
32 Misc. 778; 66 N.Y.S. 485

Counsel

Myers, Goldsmith & Bronner, for appellant., Eugene Newman, for respondent.

Pelonsky v. C. L. Pierson Manufacturing Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The answer of the defendant clearly shows that it had knowledge of all facts necessary to enable it to proceed with the trial herein. It appears to us that the demand for a bill of particulars was made probably to delay the speedy trial of this action as before stated. No bill of particulars was needed to enable it to try the issues formed by the pleadings.

The order appealed from is reversed. Defendant’s motion for bill of particulars denied, with ten dollars costs, and disbursements of this appeal.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Conlan and Hascall, JJ.

Order reversed, motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.