City of New York Municipal Court, 1901

Papay v. City of New York

Papay v. City of New York
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided February 15, 1901
34 Misc. 815; 68 N.Y.S. 1145

Counsel

Nathaniel Tonkin, for appellant., William K. Hill and William F. Bomber, for respondents.

Papay v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is hereby reversed without costs to either party, providing the appellant consents to the entry of an order of discontinuance against defendants and payment to each of them of a full bill of costs and disbursements to date, said terms to be complied with within five days after entry of such order. If these terms are not satisfactory to appellant then the order appealed from is hereby affirmed, with costs and disbursements of appeal.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J., Oonlan and O’Dwyer, JJ.

Order reversed, without costs, providing appellant consents to entry of an order of discontinuance against defendants, and payment of a full bill of costs, said terms to be complied with within five days .after entry of such order. If not satisfactory to appellant, order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.