City of New York Municipal Court, 1901

Kreizer v. Kitaoka

Kreizer v. Kitaoka
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided May 15, 1901
35 Misc. 842

Counsel

Stem, Singer & Barr (William J. Barr, of counsel), for appellant., Fromme Brothers (James A. Douglas, of counsel), for respondent.

Kreizer v. Kitaoka

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from must he affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court’s mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in, at least, the sum of $250.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Delehanty and Schuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.