Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
City of New York Municipal Court, 1901

Rush v. Klein

Rush v. Klein
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided June 15, 1901 · Hascall
35 Misc. 854; 72 N.Y.S. 1126

Counsel

Menken Brothers (Mortimer M. Menken, of counsel), for appellant., J. Harry Hull (Chas. W. Ridgway, of counsel), for respondent.

Rush v. Klein

Opinion of the Court

Hascall, J.

The appellant, by the answer interposed, is in position to contest each item of the plaintiff’s claim, thus bringing this case within 137 N. Y. 616, and we, therefore, decide that the order appealed from was properly made.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.

Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.