City of New York Municipal Court, 1901

Rush v. Klein

City of New York Municipal Court · Decided June 15, 1901 · Hascall

35 Misc. 854; 72 N.Y.S. 1126

Counsel

Menken Brothers (Mortimer M. Menken, of counsel), for appellant., J. Harry Hull (Chas. W. Ridgway, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Hascall, J.

Hnder all the circumstances disclosed by the papers upon which the attachment was founded, and conforming with the dictum of the court in 130 N. Y. 517 et seq., it seems to us that the order must be left undisturbed.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent

Conlan and O’Dwyer, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.