Eisenstein v. Old Dominion Steamship Co.
Opinion of the Court
Motion is made for an order placing the cause on the Special Calendar for actions the trial of which will not occupy more than two hours. Objection is made that the motion is prematurely brought in that the cause has been noticed for the first Monday of October, 1907, and that a motion to advance should not be entertained until after that date. Rule II of the Rules of the City Court of the city of Eew York provides in respect to such motions: “Inactions on contract, of replevin or for conversion, where a note of issue has been filed and the cause noticed for trial, either party ma.y apply to the Special Term, on two days’ notice to the adverse party, for an order placing the cause on the Special Calendar.” In this action a note of issue has been filed and the cause noticed for trial. The language of the rule is clear and its meaning plain. In the. absence of some controlling reason to the contrary the rule should be construed according to its explicit terms. Eo such reason is presented. It is urged that until the date for which the cause is noticed for trial no cause can properly be said to be upon the cal
Motion granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.