Wagner v. Rosenthal
Opinion of the Court
This is a motion why an order should not be' granted directing the defendant to separately number and state the counterclaims and to separately number and state the defenses contained in his answer to the amended complaint herein. It appears-from the answer that the defendant by the first paragraph thereof sets up a denial to the plaintiff’s second and third allegations of the complaint. By the second paragraph thereof defendant sets up a counterclaim. By the third paragraph thereof he sets up a defense to the plaintiff’s cause of action. By the fifth paragraph thereof he sets up a further defense to the cause of action alleged in the complaint.
In the manner in which the denials, defenses, and counterclaims are alleged, it seems as though they were jumbled, and not separated and numbered as required by the Code of Civil Procedure. First, the de
The motion must therefore be granted; but as it appears from the answer that the defendant has a good defense and counterclaim to the plaintiff’s cause of action, although inartificially pleaded, the motion will be granted, without costs, and with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer as herein indicated within five days of the service of the order to be entered hereon.
Settle order on one day’s notice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.