City of New York Municipal Court, 1932

Marty v. Roberts

Marty v. Roberts
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided December 29, 1932 · Steuer
146 Misc. 332; 261 N.Y.S. 144; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1677

Counsel

Speiser & Speiser, for the plaintiff., Herman W. Bernstein, for the defendant.

Marty v. Roberts

Opinion of the Court

Steuer, J.

Motion to confirm referee’s report granted. Upon confirmation the judgment entered herein December 13, 1932, is vacated and the complaint dismissed. Because of the failure to *333have a guardian ad litem appointed for the infant defendant no jurisdiction was acquired. Jurisdiction could not be acquired in this action by the infant’s coining of age. The situation involving an infant plaintiff is altogether different, as then the failure to appoint is only an irregularity. Plaintiff’s remedy is to start a new action and to apply to the discretion of the court for a preference. Order signed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.