City of New York Municipal Court, 1937

Horwitz v. Diamond

Horwitz v. Diamond
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided January 6, 1937 · Keller
161 Misc. 665; 293 N.Y.S. 231; 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1492

Counsel

Rabenold & Scribner [Edward J. Malament of counsel; Freeland F. Penney with him on the brief], for the plaintiff., Charles Eno, for the defendants.

Horwitz v. Diamond

Opinion of the Court

Keller, J.

The reasonable expense incurred by the accommodation indorser in consequence of the maker’s default, including counsel fees and disbursements, may be recovered from the maker. (Thompson v. Taylor, 72 N. Y. 32.) The counsel fee of $250 was admitted by defendant’s attorney to be reasonable if the maker was liable in the circumstance. The additional items consisting of cablegrams, telephones, typewriting, photostats, process servers’ fees, postage and miscellaneous were not proven in the amounts claimed. I think $100 would reasonably cover these items. Judgment for plaintiff for $350, with appropriate interest. Defendant is allowed a stay of ten days and thirty days to make a case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.