City of New York Municipal Court, 1943

Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.

Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.
City of New York Municipal Court · Decided April 19, 1943 · Byrnes
180 Misc. 273; 41 N.Y.S.2d 577; 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1866

Counsel

Walter H. Bond for defendant., Reuben Golin for plaintiff.

Pohlers v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.

Opinion of the Court

Byrnes, Ch. J.

Motion to confirm the report of the Official Referee is granted. However, irrespective of whether or not the party served was in fact a 11 managing agent,” the failure *274to fully comply with subdivision 3 of section 229 of the Civil Practice Act is fatal to the service. The affidavit is silent as to any attempt to effect service under subdivision 2 of section 229 of the Civil Practice Act. Proof that service could not be. made under subdivision 1 is not of itself sufficient to dispense with the method set forth in subdivision 2. The motion to vacate and set aside the service of the summons is granted. (McKeon v. McGowan & Sons, 229 App. Div. 568.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.