Maysonett v. H. J. Butler Bros.
Opinion of the Court
The attorney to be substituted has the right to compensation on a quantum meruit basis. If he were to request a percentage, the amount of compensation could be determined at the conclusion of the case. However, he does not request a percentage hut a reasonable fee in a definite amount, to which he is entitled, as he need not speculate upon the outcome of the case in the hands of another attorney. When he agreed to take the case on a contingency basis he was, so to speak, speculating upon the result of his own legal services. He is not required to make his compensation contingent upon the outcome of the case if he is not to continue as attorney.
The right to substitution is, of course, immediate and absolute. The motion is granted to the extent of substituting Bertram S. Futterman, Esq., as attorney for the plaintiff Felix Maysonett in place and stead of Philip Bareish, Esq. (Matter of Weitling, 266 N. Y. 184.) Such substitution shall be without prejudice to
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.