New York City Court, 1889

Pickett v. Gollner

Pickett v. Gollner
New York City Court · Decided October 28, 1889 · Wyck
7 N.Y.S. 196; 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 691; 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1005 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alfred JR. Page, for appellant. H. F. Koeplte, for respondent.

Pickett v. Gollner

Opinion of the Court

Van Wyck, J.

In our opinion the language of this mechanic’s lien statute (Laws 1885, c. 342, § 1) is broad enough to include a claim for terracing *197and sodding the yard of a building lot. Moran v. Chase, 52 N. Y. 346; Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 549. The form of the judgment is substantially correct. Lawson v. Reilly, 13 Civ. Proc. R. 290. The other questions raised by appellant have been disposed of adversely to him by the court of appeals in Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 539. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.