New York City Court, 1891

Turner v. Putnam

Turner v. Putnam
New York City Court · Decided February 24, 1891
13 N.Y.S. 567; 37 N.Y. St. Rep. 395; 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1567 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. W. Tenney, for appellant. Horace Graves, for respondent.

Turner v. Putnam

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We have carefully read all the testimony in this case, and are satisfied plaintiff made out a prima face case for the jury. There is testimony which strongly tends to show that defendant, knowing him to be a real-estate broker, employed plaintiff to sell certain premises; that plaintiff brought the same to the attention of the purchasers, and brought them and the defendant together; and that defendant sold these parties the premises for the price he asked. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.