New York City Court, 1893

Dornbach v. Hahn

New York City Court · Decided July 1, 1893

5 Misc. 588

Counsel

Frank Obernier, for plaintiffs (respondents)., August P. Wagener, for defendant (appellant).

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellant has not, by oral argument or printed points, called our attention to any exception or ground *589upon which he claims that this judgment should be reversed; he has simply submitted the appeal book. Our examination of the case discloses no reason for a reversal.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.