New York City Court, 1893

Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad

Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad
New York City Court · Decided December 15, 1893
6 Misc. 602; 26 N.Y.S. 1136; 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 904

Counsel

Thos. E. Pearsall, for plaintiff (respondent)., Morris & Whitehouse, for defendant (appellant).

Lombard v. Brooklyn City Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The defendant in this case conceded its liability, and its counsel seeks a new trial only on the ground that the damages fixed by the jury were excessive. We have carefully examined the appellant’s brief and the printed record, and conclude that we should not set aside the verdict, as it does not appear from the evidence to have been the result of sympathy or prejudice.

Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyok, J.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.