New York City Court, 1893

Barber v. Gray

Barber v. Gray
New York City Court · Decided March 17, 1893 · Fitzsimons
51 N.Y. St. Rep. 493

Counsel

Albert Fromme, for app’lt; Billings & Cardoza, for resp’ts.

Barber v. Gray

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, J.

The defendant’s answer presented a sufficient cause of counterclaim, but the same being for unliquidated damages, he was required to submit evidence showing his actual damages, which, if done in the case, because of plaintiff's failure to serve a reply, would have entitled the trial justice to instruct the jury to deduct the amount of damages so ascertained from the amount claimed by plaintiff, and render a verdict for plaintiff for the balance found díte.

The failure of defendant to submit, or offer to submit, testimony of the character mentioned, justified the trial justice in directing a verdict, as he did, in plaintiff’s favor for the amount claimed.

The fact that he gave a wrong reason does not affect his action, which, as above shown, was right.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., and McGown, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.