New York City Court, 1893

Morowski v. Rohrig

Morowski v. Rohrig
New York City Court · Decided February 8, 1893 · McGown
51 N.Y. St. Rep. 946

Counsel

Gumbleton, Flanagan & Hottenroth, for resp’t; Simon Sultan, for app’lt.

Morowski v. Rohrig

Opinion of the Court

McGown, J.

After a careful examination of the appeal book herein, of the rulings and findings of the trial justice, and of the exceptions taken by the attorney for the defendant on the trial herein, we find no error committed by the trial justice, and that there are no merits in the exceptions taken herein.

Judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs to the respondents.

Van Wyck and Fitzsimons, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.