New York City Court, 1893

Katz v. Atfield

Katz v. Atfield
New York City Court · Decided March 17, 1893 · Fitzsimons
51 N.Y. St. Rep. 947

Counsel

Henry Daily, Jr,, for app’lts; John McGuin, for resp’t.

Katz v. Atfield

Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, J.

The order of the general term' of this court, dated ¡November, 1892, required the payment by the appellant herein of thirty dollars costs imposed by the order of Justice McCarthy as well as all other motion costs imposed at any time by the court against said appellant and unpaid at the time of the making of the said general term order.

Whatever the amount of said costs were, appellant was bound to know, and respondent herein was not required to tax the same by the clerk of this court.

The appellant’s failure to pay snch costs entitled the special term justice to> make the order appealed from, whenever it appeared to his satisfaction that the conditions and requirements of said general term order were not complied with.

The appeal papers show that the appellant herein failed to comply with said general term order, and therefore the order appealed from was rightly made and must be affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.