Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York City Court, 1894

Davies v. Kalbfleisch

Davies v. Kalbfleisch
New York City Court · Decided July 1, 1894
9 Misc. 710; 29 N.Y.S. 1142

Counsel

Edward V. B. Kissam, for appellant., W. Rappelyea Davies, for respondent.

Davies v. Kalbfleisch

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The exceptions were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614.

The judgment and order denying new trial shpuld be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Clement, Ch. J., and Van Wyck, J.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.