New York City Court, 1894

Davies v. Kalbfleisch

New York City Court · Decided June 25, 1894

62 N.Y. St. Rep. 873

Counsel

Edward V. B. Kissam, for app’lt; W. Bapelyea Davies, for resp’t.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of *874his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614; 48 St. Rep. 73. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.