New York City Court, 1895

Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad

Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad
New York City Court · Decided June 24, 1895
34 N.Y.S. 1144; 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Hoadly, Lauterbach & Johnson, for appellant., Jas. & T. H. Troy, for respondent.

Neill v. Brooklyn El. Railroad

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the damages awarded by the jury were excessive. We have very carefully read the appeal book and the briefs in the case, and, while the verdict was large, we do not think that we should exercise our power to reduce the damages. The court was right in refusing to compel the plaintiff to remove his clothing and exhibit his knee to the jury. Roberts v. Railroad Co., 29 Hun, 154; McQuigan v. Railroad Co., 129 N. Y. 50, 29 N. E. 235; Elfers v. Woolley, 116 N. Y. 294, 22 N. E. 548; Lyon v. Railroad Co., 142 N. Y. 298, 37 N. E. 113. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.