NYC Family Court, 1976

Hacquin v. Collier

Hacquin v. Collier
NYC Family Court · Decided July 9, 1976 · Rosenbloom
87 Misc. 2d 994; 386 N.Y.S.2d 185; 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2343

Counsel

Buyck, Baxter, Springer, Fitzsimmons & Fitzpatrick (James B. Fitzsimmons of counsel), for respondent. Edward L. D’Amico for petitioner.

Hacquin v. Collier

Opinion of the Court

Richard D. Rosenbloom, J.

This is a motion brought by respondent to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action. The petition is for support and is filed under the Uniform Support of Dependents Law (Domestic Relations Law, art 3-A). Petitioner alleges that she is the ex-wife of respondent and attaches a decree of divorce dated February 25, 1971.

Subdivision 1 of section 32 of the Domestic Relations Law provides that a husband is liable for the support of his wife. No mention is made throughout article 3-A of any liability to an ex-wife. The statute clearly imposes a liability on a husband to support his wife, but not his ex-wife. (Fleischer v Fleischer, 24 AD2d 667.)

Accordingly, respondent’s motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.