Conklin v. Rogers
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
The petitioner has moved this court for an order pursuant to CPLR 5525 (subd [c]) for the settlement of a transcript of a custody proceeding over which this court presided. The respondent does not object to the contents of the transcript. It is the respondent’s contention that due to the fact that the transcript was not prepared by the official court reporter, it is not a proper record on appeal.
The court has not been provided with a copy of the transcript in question. The court understands that the transcript was prepared by a private court reporting service whose agent was present in the courtroom during the custody proceeding. There is no question that prior to the custody proceeding being commenced, there was a discussion between the attorneys for the respective parties and the court regarding the presence of Pamela S. Boyd, a private stenographic reporter, in the courtroom. At that time it was understood that Miss Boyd was there at the request of Stuart Glass, Esq., so that he could be provided, if he so wished, with a copy of a transcript of the court proceeding, in advance, for later use in the proceeding being litigated. It was further understood that Helen Kroeger, who was also present in court, is this court’s official
Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.