Copous v. Kauffman
Copous v. Kauffman
1 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 5; 1841 N.Y. LEXIS 343
Opinion of the Court
The chancellor decided that after a bill had been dismissed as to a defendant, the court has no jurisdiction over him to order him to be examined as a party to the suit; that on a creditors’ bill the wife of tbe judgment debtor cau-not be compelled to submit to an examination as a witness for the purpose of obtaining a discovery of her husband’s property. Order of i the vice-chancellor reversed. Costs of guardian ad litem to be costs in the cause.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.