Saratoga Chancery Court, 1844

Meads v. Wandell

Meads v. Wandell
Saratoga Chancery Court · Decided April 2, 1844
4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 14

Counsel

J. Edwards and O. Meads, for complainants; A. Ta-ber and E. C. Litchfield, for defendants.

Meads v. Wandell

Opinion of the Court

Decided that the grant of a fraehise to keep a ferry between two places does not necessarily exclude the right of the state, or those in whom the right of granting such a franchise is vested, from granting a similar right to others between different points ; unless there is something exclusive in the terms of the first grant.

That an injunction will not bo granted to prevent a party from using a franchise which he claims as belonging to him, *15until the complainant has established his exclusive right thereto, by a suit at law, or otherwise.

Injunction dissolved; costs to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.