Burger v. Tobias

Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.

Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,