Colonna v. State
Opinion of the Court
In the nine claims now before this court for decision the claimant seeks to recover from the State the sum of $59,528.91, and he bases his right to make such recovery upon the theory that if water had not leaked and seeped into his quarry from the Barge canal during the periods covered by these claims, he could have taken out 95,220 cubic yards of block and 206,310 lineal feet of curb. It is unthinkable that the claimant should receive such an award as he asks. He still has left in his quarry all of the stone originally there except for a small amount taken out by him in 1926 and for that year he received an award for damages for pumping and loss of production on account of water coming into his quarry from the Barge- canal. I am satisfied that if there had been an active market and demand for stone, the quarry could have been operated during all the periods covered by these claims, and that the amount of water, coming into the quarry was not so great but what the quarry could for a small amount have been kept in condition so that quarrying operations could have been carried on. If quarrying operations had been carried on, the claimant would have been entitled to recover the cost of keeping the water out of his quarry and in addition thereto the loss on production between working the quarry under wet conditions and under dry conditions. The damage to the claimant would then have been definite and certain.
Barrett, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.