The Superior Court of New York City, 1828

Penny v. Van Cleef

Penny v. Van Cleef
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided October 15, 1828
1 Hall 165

Counsel

Mr. G. W. Strong, for the defendant,, Mr. G. Griffin, for the defendant,

Penny v. Van Cleef

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs are entitled to the effect of their motion, as a matter of course: an application to amend never being refused where it does not operate as a surprise upon the defendant, nor subject him to injury. The plaintiffs, however, must pay the costs of the motion; and the defendant has leave to withdraw his pleas, and plead again de novo. He cannot be subjected to any injury by the amendments, because he will have every opportunity to shape his defence according to the exigency of the case.

Motion granted on payment of costs.

[C. C. King, atty. for the plffs. G. W. Strong, atty. for the deft.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.