The Superior Court of New York City, 1851

Castellanos v. Jones

Castellanos v. Jones
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided November 29, 1851 · Duer, Ford, Oakley, Sand
6 Sandf. 679

Counsel

A. L. Brown, for the defendant., H. P. Hastings, for the plaintiff.

Castellanos v. Jones

Concurring Opinion

(with the concurrence of

Duer and. Sand-, ford, Justices.)

The question is, whether the court will entertain, this application after twenty days have elapsed without objection to the bond, and after considering the point we conclude that the motion should not be granted.

When a bond is executed in the lowest penalty that the stat-; ute prescribes, (2 R. S. 620,) and the defendant does not object to it within the time permitted him for excepting to the sureties, he will not afterwards be heard to object to the amount. We will not say that we will not order the penalty to be larger on sufficient cause shown in the first instance, but here the party comes too late.

Motion denied.

Opinion of the Court

Oakley, Ch. J.,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.