The Superior Court of New York City, 1875

Lehmair v. Griswold

Lehmair v. Griswold
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided December 6, 1875 · Freedman
8 Jones & S. 100

Counsel

A. Heydenreich, attorney for appellants; Chas. Lee Clark, of counsel., S. Kauffman, attorney for respondents ; Lewis Sanders, of counsel.

Lehmair v. Griswold

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

The summons is for relief, and the complaint is in tort, alleging a conversion of two sums of money. For the purposes of this appeal, the character of the action is determined by the complaint.

The counter-claims demurred to, are, therefore, not available in this action under § 150 of the Code.

They do not arise out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim, nor are they connected with the subject of the action. The words “the subject of the action” mean “the facts constituting plaintiff’s cause of action” (Chamberet v. Cagney, 2 Sweeny, 385).

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Speir, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.