The Superior Court of New York City, 1878

Canzi v. Conner

Canzi v. Conner
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided January 15, 1878 · Freedman
4 Abb. N. Cas. 148

Counsel

W. S. Wolf, for appellant., Vanderpoel, Green & Cuming and Sullivan, Kobbe & Fowler, for respondents.

Canzi v. Conner

Opinion of the Court

Freedman, J.

The settlement of a case is left very much to the discretion of the judge presiding at the trial.

In the case at bar the amendment must be deemed to have been allowed in accordance with the judge’s minutes, which corresponded with the stenographic minutes, and hence it was allowed in accordance with the preponderance of evidence bearing upon the real fact.

The appeal from the order should be dismissed, with costs, and as it was conceded in the argument that in that contingency nothing was left of appellant’s case, the motion made by respondents should be granted, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.