The Superior Court of New York City, 1878

Egan v. Walsh

Egan v. Walsh
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided February 4, 1878 · Freedman
11 Jones & S. 402

Counsel

Nelson Smith & Leavitt, attorneys, and Nelson Smith, of counsel, for appellant, urged :, E. Yenni, attorney, B. F. Sawyer, of counsel, for respondent :

Egan v. Walsh

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Freedman, J.

—Upon the whole case, as it was made to appear on the motion below, sufficient grounds appeared to authorize the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to appoint a receiver during the pendency of the suit. The action is in a condition to be tried at once, and at the trial the rights of all parties can be more satisfactorily determined than upon the present appeal.

The papers submitted presenting a case within the rule warranting the order as made, the order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Curtis, Ch. J., and Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.