Gruman v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
plaintiff’s assignors, Fitch & Co., purchased one hundred shares Rock Island R. R. stock for the defendant, on a margin, May 14, 1870, and carried the stock for him. Fitch &
This was a speculative purchase of stock, and the relation between Pitch & Co., the brokers, and the defendant, for whom they acted, was that of pledgee and pledgor. The defendant was entitled to notice of the time and place of sale, and the sale of the stock with an omission to give such notice, was an act of conversion on the part of the brokers, that debars their assignee from maintaining this action against the defendant. Nor was their position altered by their subsequent offer of stock to the defendant upon his paying them the balance claimed of $1,596.29 (Markham v. Jaudon, 41 N. Y. 235 ; Stenton v. Jerome, 54 Id. 480 ; Baker v. Drake, 66 Id. 518 ; Taussig v. Hart, 58 Id. 425). .
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed with costs.
Sedgwick and Freedmah, JJ., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.