Ponvert v. Belmont

wrote for affirmance with costs, liokii;ig substantially, as follows:—The justice of the plaintiff’s claim has been established by the general tcnu of this court in Ponvert v. Belmont (42 Super. Ct. 531). The error of the referee on the former trial has been corrected on the new trial; in other respects, the judgment is as it was before. Appellant’s exceptions to rulings of referee-do not call for interference with judgment.

Speir, J., concurred.