Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.
Steinberg v. Manhattan Railway Co.
14 Jones & S. 216
Opinion of the Court
The defendant appeals from an order, denying Ms application that the guardian ad litem of the plaintiff file security for costs. The Code of Civil Procedure makes the guardian ad litem responsible for costs (§ 469), but it does not require him to file security therefor. If the legislature had intended that an infant plaintiff should be restrained from prosecuting an action until his guardian ad litem filed security for costs, which, in the present application it is claimed should be for $750, it is but reasonable to suppose they would have made some enactment to that effect.
• Freedman, J., concurred.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.