Trimble v. More

The case of Crompton v. Conkling (15 Nat. Bankr. Reg. 417), requires us to hold that, in a case like the present, the individual discharged in a proceeding begun, carried on, and ended by him solely, is not relieved, by force of his discharge, from the partnership debts.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs, disbursements to be taxed by the clerk.

Truax, J., concurred.