The Superior Court of New York City, 1882

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided June 5, 1882
16 Jones & S. 539

Counsel

Julius Lippman, for appellant., William E. Barnett and A. H. Anderson, for respondent.

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Opinion of the Court

The court at General Term, after stating the facts, as above, held:

“Upon the whole case, it affirmatively and clearly appeared that the deceased, in attempting to cross as he did, was guilty of contributory negligence, and the complaint was properly dismissed.”

*541Opinion of Freedman J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.