The Superior Court of New York City, 1883

Flynn v. New York Elevated Railroad

Flynn v. New York Elevated Railroad
The Superior Court of New York City · Decided May 16, 1883
17 Jones & S. 536

Counsel

Deyo, Duer & Bauerdorf, for appellant. Louis J. Grant, for respondent.

Flynn v. New York Elevated Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Ingraham, JJ., sitting. Per Curiam.—The present appellants had no interest in the discontinuance or maintenance of the action against their former co-defendants. - The amendment allowed did not make in the amended complaint' any other cause of action, than was relied on in the original complaint. The judge belpw had power to allow the amendment and it does not appear that his discretion in the matter was improperly exercised. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.