Flynn v. New York Elevated Railroad
Flynn v. New York Elevated Railroad
17 Jones & S. 536
Opinion of the Court
Sedgwick, Ch. J., Truax and Ingraham, JJ., sitting. Per Curiam.—The present appellants had no interest in the discontinuance or maintenance of the action against their former co-defendants. - The amendment allowed did not make in the amended complaint' any other cause of action, than was relied on in the original complaint. The judge belpw had power to allow the amendment and it does not appear that his discretion in the matter was improperly exercised. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.